white-house-blue-print-1024.jpgMy story in this month’s Wired, on how technologically savvy Obama’s presidency can be, headed to the printer just before Christmas and came out online today. There were several developments on the Obama Web/technology front in the interim (although, for better or worse, not as many as I’d expected). The most significant was probably a non-happening: Obama has yet to name someone to his promised “federal chief technology officer” position. Steve Hamm at Business Week had the scoop last week that the choices have narrowed to Padmasree Warrior, CTO at Cisco, and Vivek Kundra, CTO of the District of Columbia. Outside of hearing good things about Kundra while reporting around DC last fall, I don’t have a take on the choice. The more salient point to me is that the decision to not name someone before taking office reveals something (not unexpected) about the relative priority of “rebooting the government” on Obama’s priority list.

Over at Change.gov, the transition team went through another round with the “Open for Questions” feature, with responses from press secretary Robert Gibbs. Participation was high: “103,512 people submitted 76,031 questions and cast 4,713,083 votes,” according to the Obama folks. But after moderating out the Blagojevich questions in the first round, the transition team chose this time to simply ignore the most popular question (about naming an independent investigator to look into possible Bush administration crimes), as noted by The Nation’s Ari Melber.

Post continued…

Posted at 4:30 pm | Comments Off | Filed under Articles, Politics, Technology, Wired |

Just in time for the inauguration, my latest feature for Wired — on whether and how President Obama will carry out his promises to reboot the federal government — is available online. The glossy version should be out sometime later this week or early next.

I’ll have more to write shortly here about what has happened vis-à-vis Obama’s digital strategies since the piece closed in December. First, however, a note of disclosure. Originally the piece contained a description of my own minimal participation in the campaign, part of a longer section on how Obama utilized tech to win the presidency. Eventually we decided that the role of tech in the campaign had been covered well elsewhere (most expertly by Jose Antonio Vargas at The Washington Post). So we focused the piece more on how Obama might use the same digital techniques to govern. The longer first person bit shrunk to the somewhat cryptic:

Those efforts were combined with massive database-crunching to identify potential voters who could be approached door-to-door by last-minute canvassers, myself included.

Post continued…

Posted at 2:09 pm | Comments Off | Filed under Disclosures, Politics, Recent stories, Technology, Wired |

You can catch me over at Salon’s blog The Machinist this week, guest blogging about various topics of at least tangential relevance to the blog’s general subject matter. Stop by and watch the commenters carve me up as I try to subsist without my usual thousands of words allowance, 3 month deadlines, and army of fact-checkers and copy editors…

Posted at 12:25 pm | Comments Off | Filed under Salon.com, Technology |

wiredcoveroct.jpgMy latest feature for Wired, about the science of cellulosic ethanol, begins its run on newsstands this week. The full story is also online, here. That’s a stalk of switchgrass adorning the cover, but the cellulosic ethanol described in the story actually involves making fuel from a wide variety of different plants—e.g. poplar trees, wood chips, other grasses. (Call it editorial discretion, but illustrating the cover line “THESE PLANTS ARE THE FUTURE OF ENERGY” might have cluttered things.)

The current method of producing ethanol (in the U.S.), from corn kernels, has been much castigated in the news lately. Although it seems a lot of the ethanol backlash is only tenuously based on actual research (especially when it comes to the energy balance of what goes into corn ethanol versus what you get out), there’s little doubt that corn ethanol has serious problems, enough to at least call its massive subsidies into question.

There is, however, another way of making ethanol, using a biological or chemical process to extract the cellulose, or “structural” part, from plants (rather than the starch, as in the case of corn ethanol, or the sugar, as in the case of the sugarcane ethanol in Brazil). Cellulosic ethanol usually makes the last couple paragraphs of ethanol stories; it’s declared to be some indeterminate number of years off, a biofuel holy grail awaiting a scientific breakthrough. There is general agreement that if we could make it, cellulosic fuel avoids most if not all of the problems of corn ethanol. Meanwhile, our federal energy targets (which are closer to hopes than targets, really) essentially assume that hundreds of millions of gallons cellulosic ethanol will soon be arriving. So, what gives? Post continued…

Posted at 3:43 pm | 1 Comment | Filed under Environment/Energy, Recent stories, Science, Technology, Wired |

“Cartographers manufacture power,” the eminent geographer J.B. Harley once wrote. So what happens to that power when cartography goes digital? That’s the question I endeavor to tackle in my latest feature for Wired, “The Whole Earth Catalogued.” It’s just out, in the July issue that features the Transformers movie on the cover (or alternately, if you for some reason elected to have your cover “personalized,” it features my story and you on the cover. It’s just like that booth at Six Flags!) In any case, the story is also online here.

Ke Iki Road.jpgAs the online version’s headline implies (or possibly, overstates to the point of self-parody), it’s about how Google Maps and Google Earth are altering the way people relate to geography. Perhaps more interestingly, it’s about how thousands of people have taken the tools made by Google and other companies to become their own mapmakers.

Posted at 3:12 pm | 1 Comment | Filed under Recent stories, Technology, Wired |

The most recent issue of Discover magazine (not yet online online here) contains a long interview I did with Paul Allen late last fall. Allen, of course, in addition to being the cofounder of Microsoft and one of the world’s wealthiest individuals, is the owner of the Seattle Seahawks and Portland Trailblazers and a prolific technology investor and philanthropist.

For Discover, though, we were most interested in his appetite for scientific and exploration projects. Raised on science fiction (he opened a science fiction museum in Seattle, in fact), Allen has put huge chunks of money towards efforts like SpaceShipOne, the Allen Brain Atlas, and SETI. In the interview, he talks about how he picks his scientific spots, where he’s going next, and a few old times with Mr. Gates.

Posted at 9:27 pm | Comments Off | Filed under Discover, Recent stories, Technology |

My latest feature in Wired is just out (on the newsstands at the moment; not yet online but I’ll post it when it is online here). It’s a profile of Numenta, a new company founded by Jeff Hawkins, the inventor of the Palm Pilot and Treo. Hawkins has been studying neuroscience on his own for the last couple of decades, and co-wrote a book about the fundamentals of intelligence and the human cortex, called On Intelligence, back in 2005. Numenta is his attempt to put the ideas from the book into practice, and build a new kind of artificial intelligence technology. It looks something like this:

untitled.JPG

Make sense? Well, hopefully the story explains in a somewhat intelligible fashion. I’m hoping to elaborate on a few things in the article here over the next week — there are some tricky issues in discussing any technology at such an early stage — but in the meantime feel free to offer opinions in the comments, or send me an email at the address to the right.

Posted at 4:46 pm | 5 Comments | Filed under Recent stories, Technology, Wired |

My most recent feature for Wired, which has been out on the newsstands for a couple weeks, went up online today, here. It’s about a New York company, Meaningful Machines, that has come up with a novel technology for doing machine translation — software-based translation of text from one language to another. I wrote about the company briefly in Safe, when they were at a much earlier stage. The original ideas behind the software, which are simple but fairly ingenious, sprung from the mind of Eli Abir, a former used car salesman in New Jersey with no college education and no formal training in computers, artificial intelligence, or linguistics.

Machine Translation, or MT, is a thorny problem, and the field has gone through years of eye-rolling hype and resultant vaporware. For a great comprehensive look at the area, check out Steve Silberman’s Wired story from a few years ago. But expectations are so low now (given the limitations of older systems like those currently used by Babelfish and most of Google Translate), that perhaps some new advances are being overlooked. The hottest area developing over the past few years has been statistical MT, the use of parallel translated text to train MT systems using statistical algorithms. As the story mentions, the outfits getting the best results with that method are Google (who hasn’t yet put many of their research systems up on Google Translate), Language Weaver, and IBM. Both Language Weaver’s and IBM’s are being used extensively by the military and a growing number of businesses.

Unfortunately the latest results from the NIST evaluation, which looks at MT systems head-to-head, weren’t out when the story closed. You can now find those here. Google, for the second year running, came out on top, and Language Weaver fared quite well. (Despite NIST’s new, bright-red disclaimer that its evaluation is not a competition, everyone in the MT research world still considers it the big show).

Meaningful Machines has yet to enter the NIST (non)competition, which is the most common criticism I heard about them. So there’s really no way yet to know whether their early promise will translate into a system that trumps the state-of-the-art, or they’ll end up on the scrap heap of MT failures. They, at least, believe they are on their way to human-quality translation.

Posted at 2:12 pm | 1 Comment | Filed under Recent stories, Technology, Wired |

← Previous Page


I'm Evan Ratliff, a freelance journalist, founder/editor The Atavist and feature writer for Wired, The New Yorker, National Geographic, and other publications. I'm also the story editor for Pop-Up Magazine, the world's first live magazine.

Email me with story tips, suggestions, complaints.